A Dirty Word in the Church: Why Abortion is Our Problem

In the past few years as a Criminal Justice Major, I’ve had a number of opportunities to do some pretty in depth research on a topic that is heavy and disturbing, to put it mildly. There is without a doubt a very real and very deep hatred and distaste towards those who prey on children. It’s a subject that will have even the most passive people up in arms almost immediately when the subject is brought up, and it’s not been uncommon in past years, with the introduction of notification laws such as Megan’s Law and Jessica’s Law, to hear stories of pedophiles being attacked and killed upon release from prison. Some of them don’t even make it out of prison. Such is the disgust that people feel towards these predators. And rightfully so. I’ll never forget the story of Jessica Lundsford, for whom Jessica’s Law was named. In brief, she was kidnapped one night by a neighbor, John Evander Couhy, who unbeknownst to Jessica’s father, had a long rap sheet and was a registered sex offender. Couhy kept 9-year old Jessica, bound and gagged in his closet, for close to three days. After he was done with her, be buried her in his backyard. Alive. We are appalled by stories like this, and yet we fail to even shed a tear for a much greater tragedy that happens every single day all around us. We are almost entirely apathetic to the killing of those who don’t have a voice—those who will never have a day in court or people to mourn their loss or show disgust for those who perpetrate and ignore this crime.

It is estimated that around 6 million Jews were murdered during the Holocaust. On September 11, 2001, 2740 Americans were killed in terrorist attacks across the East coast. On December 7, 1941, 2403 Americans were killed in Pearl Harbor. An estimated 800,000 deaths occurred during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. And across the world, there are approximately 126,000 babies murdered. Every day. An estimated 42 million per year. The U.S. (using the year 2000 as an approximation) accounts for 1.31 million of these deaths each year. According to Finer and Henshaw (2003), abortion is one of the most common "surgical procedures" in the U.S. today. And one out of every six woman who has an abortion claims to be an evangelical Christian.

We feel so good about ourselves when we decry the injustices in Africa, when we mourn the losses and devastation in Japan, when we solemnly look to where the Twin Towers once stood. And this week, we danced in the street celebrating the death of one man who was responsible for the deaths of so many others. We are continually appalled by the stories of helpless children preyed on by old men and other trendy human tragedies that populate the newspapers and evening television. But bring up that one dirty little controversial word—people start looking for a door, or in this case (after you’re finished reading this)—a noose.

The last thing I want to do is further a political viewpoint. In the past when I’ve made this very point, people have told me I was ignorant for bringing up the topic and not expecting it to get political. I would agree that I am indeed ignorant, because I find myself entirely unable to comprehend why Christians would try to hide such a horrific issue behind something as petty and useless as politics. I can’t stand politics. So let me say this explicitly. If you call yourself a Christian, I don’t want to hear a political or logical argument from you. I won’t listen to a word that comes out of your mouth. You are appalling in your attempts to justify one of the most disgusting human tragedies that has ever occurred, and you should be ashamed of yourself for even trying. I’ve seen dying children. Believe me, there is absolutely nothing political about it. It is tragic. It is heart wrenching. But somehow we shrug our shoulders and yawn. We shove the issue into the political realm so that we can turn what is undeniably a moral issue right at the heart of the Gospel, into an intellectual exercise in debate, and don’t have to worry about the blood of innocence haunting our safe, two-dimensional dreams.

During the holocaust there were many people who were ignorant of what was really going on. The upper echelons of the Nazi regime did quite an impressive job of covering up what was really going on to the general public. But there were some things that just couldn’t be hidden. The majority of normal everyday citizens may not have known explicitly what was happening in the concentration camps—but they knew something was happening. The church didn’t know how to respond. Decrying these human wrongs was basically akin to putting a target on your back; on the backs of everyone in your congregation. It wouldn’t be responsible to draw attention to themselves—to take actions that could result in innocent bystanders getting hurt. This whole thing was really about politics, was it not? The church doesn’t need to be involved in matters of government. The church shouldn’t be. And so, this was how the church rolled over and played dead. They played a mean fiddle while the city burned around them.

Hitler’s philosophy was pretty straightforward. Inconvenient people should die. Of course he dressed it up a bit. The handicapped, the old, the inferior, the ugly—they needed to go. The mentality behind abortion isn’t terribly different. We have deemed a certain type of people, much like Hitler did, to be inferior. Inconvenient. That’s all there is to it. We hid for years behind our scientific ignorance. It’s not a human, it’s a blob of tissue. But what do we find now that technology has torched this argument? Nothing. Nothing has changed. There is no more scientific ignorance about the issue, just plain human selfishness and complete indifference to the lives of future generations. The former United States Surgeon General, Dr. C. Everett Koop, supported this when he stated that only 3-5% of all abortions performed are because of rape or incest, or the possibility of a deformed child, or even a threat to the life of the child’s mother.

Unlike some who lived in Germany (and other countries) during World War II, we do know what’s happening. We have no ignorance to hide behind anymore. No excuses. But one thing persists. As soon as someone brings that word into the conversation—we chastise them with our eyes (at best—I’ve seen some conversations almost reach blows), and turn the conversation to legislation, comparisons to prohibition, and all the inconveniences that would be caused by getting involved in such messy procedures. What are we going to do with all of those children, someone once asked me? It is one thing to say abortion is wrong, but the church needs to provide a clear plan and alternatives for people who are thrust into these situations, and even be prepared to deal with the repercussions from the outlawing of abortion, should it ever occur. First off, let me just say that I am neither condemning the women and girls who find themselves in these situations, nor am making light of the problem. I’m not trying to simplify the situation either. What I am trying to simplify is this—there is a very simple alternative to murder. Don’t do it.

On the other hand, maybe we overcomplicate it. When I was in Africa, there was a fairly wealthy, predominately white church (not unlike our churches here in the States) that had a very simple solution: they had a baby drop-off box. Once a baby was placed in the box, it would lock, and alerts would immediately be sent to appropriate authorities, as well as several members of the church responsible for responding to this very scenario. Of course, this was not their only solution, but the point still stands—maybe we don’t want to deal with the alternative. Maybe it’s easier to just ignore the slaughter that is taking place every single day right down the street and chalk up the answer to something that only political theories can fix.

Sadly, for the church today I don’t think abortion is even the heart of the issue. It’s just the tip of the iceberg. It’s a catastrophic, visible reality that is simply a symptom to the much larger, deadlier, more horrifying truth. That we are neglecting an integral theme; a blatant and unyielding facet of the Gospel: to take care of the poor. This is not a copout answer, so hold back your sigh of relief until I’m finished. This is a direct response to those who sit around and say there is nothing we can do outside of politics to make a change. My response is that we have ignored a stewardship; we have neglected a command that was given to us in the first place. This is not a political issue. This is not an issue of law, or the Constitution. It is not an issue of legislation. This is OUR ISSUE, and we’ve let politics wander through our doors, drag it off and beat it to death. This is not a question. It’s not a suggestion. It is a mandate given directly to believers in the church. Whatever you do for the least of these, you did for me. Maybe you still aren’t seeing the connection. You should.

"Open your mouth for the mute, for the rights of all the unfortunate. Open your mouth, judge righteously, and defend the rights of the afflicted and needy." (Prov. 31:8-9)

"The righteous is concerned for the rights of the poor; the wicked does not understand such concern." (Prov. 29:7)

". . . Defend the orphan, plead for the widow." (Isaiah 1:17)

"Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world." (James 1:27)

"A father of the fatherless, a defender of widows, is God in His holy habitation" (Ps. 68:5)

"Thus says the LORD, ‘Do justice and righteousness, and deliver the one who has been robbed from the power of his oppressor. Also do not mistreat or do violence to the stranger, the orphan, or the widow; and do not shed innocent blood in this place.'" (Jer. 22:3, italics added)

"Defend the cause of the poor and the fatherless. Vindicate the oppressed and suffering" (Ps. 82:3)

There is a plethora of scripture just like this in just about every book of the Bible—yet when was the last time you heard anyone preach on any of them? The General Social Survey (GSS) in 2005 shows that there is a very significant and direct correlation between poverty and abortion. Now obviously we know that poverty is not the only factor. But what if, in this one particular area, the church stood up and did what we are commanded to do in the first place? What if the church stepped up and made this our mission? What impact would it have if we decided to take this issue back? To make it ours again? What if we had baby drop-off boxes as a regular feature of our church buildings? What if we hung signs on our church that said “Give us your unwanted children”? I wonder if we wouldn’t see a direct impact on these figures after a decade or so.

You can call me ignorant. Call me intolerant. Allow yourself to believe that I am biased and blinded by an extremist political point of view in spite of my clear attempts to distance myself from a political agenda or ideology. Justify these attitudes by telling yourself that you are helpless in this situation to do anything useful anyway. It should be clear by now that your shallow excuses don’t matter to me. I understand that there will be things that I’ve done in my life as well as things I’ve neglected to do, that I will come before my Creator one day and have to provide an answer for. But my hope is, that some of the questions He will not have to ask me is, "Why, when I made it so clear how passionate I am towards the helpless, how heartbroken I am for the fatherless, how much I hate those who prey on the innocent, did you stand by and do nothing? Why did you turn your back? Why did you stay silent?" I don’t want to answer those questions. I pity those who will have to.